On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 05:27:33PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 05:02:01PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Vadim Zhukov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 2012/11/12 Amit Kulkarni <[email protected]>:
> > >> all pkgs in kde4 pass compilation with fixes pushed into
> > >> openbsd-wip... Compiled with cmake 2.8.10. Some small issues while I
> > >> build kde3 and then the rest of the ports!!!.
> > >
> > > Just to be clear: do you want to make KDE 3 and 4 co-build or
> > > co-exist? Both goals are hard to achieve...
> > 
> > co-build with dpb -J removing dependencies along the way.
> 
> This won't work.
> 
> This requires lots of hand-holding. dpb will just error out. You will end
> up with two dpb runs.
> 
> 
> Here is a bird's eye overview of the choices.
> 
> Currently we have a rather full set of kde3 which works reasonably well.
> 
> For kde4 to "replace" that, we need to have *most* applications that were
> in kde3 working. Yes, this includes most of koffice, digikam, amarok,
> gwenview... just for applications I'm aware of.
> 
> I'm not sure kde4 can replace that on every architecture. kde4 was created
> later, and it's going to use functionalities that might be hard to achieve
> on older platforms. For instance, all of kde games have switched from
> bitmaps to SVG. I'm not sure that's reasonable for old platforms.
> 
> trinity might be a good intermediate point. It's still a lot of work, as
> the build system is radically different from kde3, so it requires creating
> new ports (but you can probably lift most of the useful code from kde3).
> 
> (for those that don't know, trinity is supposed to be kde3 ported to qt4,
> thus requiring one single qt for both kde3 and kde4).

*Meep* Wrong. Atm, trinity 3.5.13.1 is still in Qt3 (and trinity took
over Qt3 maintainership unofficially from nokia). The Qt4 port is far
from complete and quite stalled, see
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Developers/RoadMap
3.5.14/port to qt4 was originally expected this fall.

Landry

Reply via email to