On (2013-04-02 14:02), Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/04/02 08:46, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > It's weird I know, but I run things from the command line. Trying out
> > chrome, I see a few odd messages:
> > 
> > $ chrome &
> > [1] 15807
> > $ /usr/local/bin/chrome[17]: ulimit: bad limit: Invalid argument
> > /usr/local/chrome/chrome:/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.55.0: 
> > /usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.14.0 : WARNING: 
> > symbol(_ZN11__gnu_debug17_S_debug_messagesE) size mismatch, relink your 
> > program
> > [15807:-600466432:0402/082149:ERROR:user_style_sheet_watcher.cc(167)] 
> > Failed to setup watch for /home/krw/.config/chromium/Default/User 
> > StyleSheets/Custom.css
> > /usr/local/chrome/chrome:/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.55.0: 
> > /usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.14.0 : WARNING: 
> > symbol(_ZN11__gnu_debug17_S_debug_messagesE) size mismatch, relink your 
> > program
> > [15807:-691757280:0402/082149:ERROR:omnibox_view_gtk.cc(431)] Not 
> > implemented reached in virtual void OmniboxViewGtk::ApplyCaretVisibility()
> > [15807:-691757280:0402/082149:ERROR:CONSOLE(1)] "Uncaught ReferenceError: 
> > ntp is not defined", source:  (1)
> > [15807:-691757280:0402/082153:ERROR:omnibox_view_gtk.cc(431)] Not 
> > implemented reached in virtual void OmniboxViewGtk::ApplyCaretVisibility()
> > 
> > This is on all -current amd64 box (system and compiled ports) as of last 
> > night. I can't find any old libraries hanging around.
> > 
> > .... Ken
> > 
> 
> The debug_messages size mismatches are because the tables in libstdc++
> in base have fewer entries than the equivalent in libestdc++ from
> ports/lang/gcc/4.6. We could sync debug_messages with libestdc++ (at
> least make the size the same even if we didn't want to copy strings
> verbatim from the GPLv3 version) but this would only work for one
> version, there are additional entries in 4.7.
> 
> Also in this case, the plan is to switch chromium to being built with
> CLang/llvm, at which point this goes away anyway.
> 
> Not sure whether the other messages are important or not..
> 

Yeah we'll switch to clang. Ignore the other messages.

Reply via email to