On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:49:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/04/18 22:40, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson <sthen <at> openbsd.org> writes:
> > 
> > > slightly tweaked version attached: diff against your version below.
> > > notably I moved the primary category to telephony/ which I think makes
> > > sense - net/ is fairly huge so I'd like to avoid putting new ports
> > > there if there's a good alternative.
> > > 
> > > would anyone like to give me an OK to import this?
> > 
> > ping.
> > 
> > kannel is not a software mere mortals daily use, so receiving
> > grounded OKs maybe problematic.
> > 
> > Stuart, could you please commit this? Me and Roman use various
> > versions of this port on heavy loaded systems during many months,
> > if not years.
> > 
> 
> No I cannot commit it. I need an OK.

Some comments : cant the MACHINE/MACHINEWSP stuff be done via a perl -pi
subst instead of having so many patches just for that ?
be extra careful with the time_t patches, esp since 64-bits time_t is
around the corner.
the enable/kannelctl scripts are a bit cumbersome imo - all that could
be done with two rc scripts, and be simpler. Here, there are too many
indirections, with the enable/disable stuff etc. Unless the code itself
really relies on the presence/use of those scripts..

Landry

Reply via email to