Alan Corey <[email protected]> writes:

>> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:47:45 -0400
>> From: James Turner <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: new: backdir-20135056
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>

[...]

> I don't know if it's a name conflict, but I'd prefer to call the
> actual executable file just bd.  The port name is fine, but part of
> the object is to have it quick and easy to use.  3 keystrokes and it's
> done.  Kind of like netcat goes as nc.

pkg_locate says bd should be fine.  No idea about software not in ports.

[...]

-- 
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
PGP Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90  8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494

Reply via email to