On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alexey Suslikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kirill Bychkov <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 15:25, Alexey Suslikov wrote: >>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Kirill Bychkov <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 14:02, David Coppa wrote: >>>>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Alexey Suslikov >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Mostly cleanup update: >>>>>> * remove dead HOMEPAGE >>>>>> * MASTER_SITES changed >>>>>> * new distinfo >>>>>> * PFRAG.shared -> PLIST >>>>> >>>>> ok dcoppa@ for the dev who wants to do the commit >>>>> >>>>> ciao, >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Is it OK to merge PFRAG into PLIST when it's not SHARED_ONLY port and it >>>> have >>>> .a an .la libs? >>> >>> .a and .la are for static linking, no? >> >> Yes. And we still have static archs which can't create .so lib. So it's >> living >> in PFRAG.shared and not built and installed on !shared archs. > > I see. Let's go without PLIST/PFRAG.shared chunks. Ok?
your update has been already committed by sthen@
