On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:25:10AM -0400, Eric Radman wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:57:16PM +0200, Eivind Evensen wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 01:47:46AM -0400, Eric Radman wrote: > > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 02:03:13AM +0100, Federico Schwindt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Eric Radman > > > > <[1][email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Following the instructions at > > > > [2]http://www.openbsd.org/vax-simh.html ... > > > > I'm not able to establish communication using bridge(4) or bpf(4) > > > > when running simh-vax. > > > > > > > is link0 set on tun0 as specified on the vax-simh doc? > > > > f.- > > > > > > Indeed. I tried it on two different systems (both i386), one using a > > > bridge with an em(4) NIC and another with a bridge with a dc(4) NIC. > > > > > > Eric > > > > Is tun0 up? > > Yes, the instructions are pretty clear. No luck yet. > > $ ifconfig tun0 > tun0: flags=9942<BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,LINK0,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > lladdr fe:e1:ba:d1:39:fa > priority: 0 > groups: tun > status: active
That doesn't look like up to me. Compare with this: .ifconfig tun90 tun90: flags=9943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,LINK0,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 -- Eivind
