On May 30 21:01:13, [email protected] wrote: > ???2??? > 013/5/30 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> > > > On 2013/05/30 18:26, Jan Stary wrote: > > > On May 29 14:04:13, [email protected] wrote: > > > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > > > Module name: ports > > > > Changes by: [email protected] 2013/05/29 14:04:13 > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > print/texlive/base: Makefile > > > > print/texlive/base/pkg: README > > > > Added files: > > > > print/texlive/base/patches: > > > > > > patch-texk_texlive_linked_scripts_bibexport_bibexport_sh > > > > > > patch-texk_texlive_linked_scripts_installfont_installfont-tl > > > > > > patch-texk_texlive_linked_scripts_latexfileversion_latexfileversion > > > > > > > > Log message: > > > > Big shebang update for TeXlive. Unbreaks a lot of bundled scripts. > > > > > > A lot of these seem to be broken symlinks > > > to nonexistent scripts (see below). > > > > > > Am I missing something? Is another TeX-related package > > > supposed to be installed to make these symlinks work? > > > > pkglocate suggests that (at least the handful I tried) are in > > texlive_texmf-full-2012 > > > > > Yes. See also a README for texlive_base.
What's the rationale behind including these not-necessarily-working symlinks in texlive_base, instead of texlive_texmf-full that actually provides the scripts?
