On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:39:14PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > there's talk about killing that port, as it serves no useful purpose, > doesn't provide more arches than 4.8, isn't more functional than 4.8, > and uses resources (brain-power to keep it alive and cpu time to build > somewhat useless packages). > > It's not even useful for ada-boostrap, as the path can go 4.6->4.8 directly... > > Anyone sees a reason not to let it go ? >
As the original complainer, I would be happy to see it go into the attic. Pascal?
