Ping? On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking the time Jonathan. > > If this is ok for commit, can someone please commit this to 5.4 stable > branch as well as HEAD? > > Thanks, > Ryan > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Jonathan Armani <d...@asystant.net> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Tested by creating a small project, works fine on amd64, diff looks good. >> >> ok armani@ >> >> >> 2013/10/12 Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Sorry for the delay/noise, my messages don't seem to be getting >>> through to ports@. >>> >>> Has anyone had a chance to review this update yet? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ryan >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > ping? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Ryan >>> > >>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> > From: Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> >>> > Date: Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:19 PM >>> > Subject: Re: [Update] py-django 1.5.4 - fixed >>> > To: "ports@openbsd.org" <ports@openbsd.org> >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> Attached are the updated diffs to account for the most recent security >>> >> release. I am still having the same regression issue with version 1.5.4 >>> >> as >>> >> I indicated in my initial email so please test. >>> > >>> > After reporting the issue upstream, the issue I was experiencing has >>> > been fixed. I applied the fix from upstream to the attached diff. Link >>> > to the issue is below for reference. >>> > >>> > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/21118 >>> > >>> > The attached diff now passes all regressions on i386 for me. Please >>> > test and if ok, can someone please commit to both head and the OpenBSD >>> > 5.4 branch? >>> > >>> > Let me know if there are any questions. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Ryan >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Please let me know if there are any questions. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Ryan >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Please disregard my previous message. A few hours after I posted this >>> >>> to ports, the django project released another security update. I'm >>> >>> going to >>> >>> regenerate my previous diffs with the new update and resubmit here for >>> >>> testing. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sorry for the noise. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ryan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Attached are diffs that bring django to the latest security releases. >>> >>>> The first diff titled "py-django_OpenBSD_5_3_stable.diff" brings >>> >>>> py-django >>> >>>> to version 1.4.7 in the openbsd 5.3 stable branch. Tested on i386 and >>> >>>> all >>> >>>> regression tests pass. I know that the 5.4 branch has been tagged but >>> >>>> if >>> >>>> possible, can someone please test and apply to the 5.3 stable branch? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> The second diff titled "py-django_1_5_3.diff" brings py-django 1.5.3 >>> >>>> in trunk and in the 5.4 branch. However, I am experiencing a >>> >>>> regression >>> >>>> failure with this in the latest OpenBSD snapshot that makes me >>> >>>> hesitant in >>> >>>> requesting that this be committed. I have made a request in the django >>> >>>> mailing list to see if they know what may be causing this but if anyone >>> >>>> wishes to test this in the meantime, please feel free to do so. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Please let me know if there are any questions/comments. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>> >>>> Ryan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>
py-django_1_5_4_fix.diff
Description: Binary data
