On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:30:37 +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/11/14 12:18, Aaron wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Alexander Pakhomov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > bitcoin-qt also compiles: > > > > > > cd /usr/ports/pobj/bitcoin-.../bitcoin-... > > > bitcoin-qt.pro: remove "-lrt" line > > > qmake4 BOOST_LIBS_SUFFIX=-mt INCLUDE_PATH+=/usr/local/include/db4 > > > gmake > > > > > > Don't know should I make a separate port or it is better to include in > > > this. > > > > Not sure either - but here is a version of just bitcoin-qt :D > > The manpages here conflict with the other port in bitcoin.tar.gz.. > Also I noticed when reading the Makefile that there's an internal copy > of leveldb, can it use leveldb from ports instead?
My version in openbsd-wip does that, so maybe you can use that as a starting point. > > Maybe a flavor vs a different port? > > I don't think a flavour makes sense, if you want to build them in the same > port then just subpackage the qt interface, separate ports would be fine with > me too though (but I think I'd have ports/net/bitcoin/qt and > ports/net/bitcoin/daemon or something, so you can use a Makefile.inc so > there's less chance of them getting out-of-sync later). I think the MULTI_PACKAGES approach is the sanest solution; I just didn't bother with it because I didn't need bitcoin-qt anyway.
