On 11/29/13 11:47, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:27:09AM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote: >> Not the most exciting port, I know. But I do actually use it. >> >> Stu > > Looks fine to me, except I would probably use 'post-patch' > instead of 'do-configure' to tweak the shebang lines.
It doesn't matter in this case, but in some cases doing the shebang tweaks in post-patch can mess up things for update-patches. > Perhaps we could fix the provided Makefile and submit a patch > upstream, instead of having do-build? Aside from the patch, there are some other bits I plan on sending upstream so I'll see what I can do with the Makefile while I'm at it. > I don't think these are blocking issues for importing it, so ok. Great, thanks! Stu
