On 03/28/13 20:17, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/03/28 18:07, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:05:03PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> ok with me, but we should pick up the minor security update to 4.2.5-P1 >>> as well. trivial diff but I'm not running it here so haven't tested. >> >> Why not call the rc script edhcpd like we do with nginx in ports? > > the package is called isc-dhcp, also we already have a script for > the isc-bind package, /etc/rc.d/isc_named (and the two might often be > run together for people doing ddns updates), so this way makes sense > to me. > > (I wonder if nginx will ever pick up the module support from Tengine.. > that would get rid of most of the reason for having the separate version > in ports..) >
Is there any problem with the rc-script, that it hasn't gone in yet?
