On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:46:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/04/14 12:58, Fabian Raetz wrote:
> > Hi ports@,
> >
> > I'm working on a update for databases/db/v4 in
> > preparation for updating openbsd-wip/net/bitcoin.
> >
> >
> > When running 'make package', i get the following
> > Warnings/Errors for all files under /usr/local/share:
> >
> > +++ Sun Apr 13 22:26:43 CEST 2014
> > ===> Building package for db-java-4.8.30p0v0
> > Create /usr/packages/amd64/all/db-java-4.8.30p0v0.tgz
> > [KError: no @owner for
> > /usr/local/share/doc/db4/gsg/JAVA/BerkeleyDB-Core-JAVA-GSG.pdf (mischi)
> > Warning: no @group for
> > /usr/local/share/doc/db4/gsg/JAVA/BerkeleyDB-Core-JAVA-GSG.pdf (wsrc)
> > Error: modes don't match for
> > /usr/local/share/doc/db4/gsg/JAVA/BerkeleyDB-Core-JAVA-GSG.pdf
> > [KError: no @owner for
> > /usr/local/share/doc/db4/gsg/JAVA/CoreEnvUsage.html (mischi)
> > Warning: no @group for
> > /usr/local/share/doc/db4/gsg/JAVA/CoreEnvUsage.html (wsrc)
> > Error: modes don't match for
> > /usr/local/share/doc/db4/gsg/JAVA/CoreEnvUsage.html
> > ....
> > ....
> > *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:1890
> > '/usr/packages/amd64/all/db-java-4.8.30p0v0.tgz')
> > *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2439
> > '_internal-package')
> > *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/databases/db/v4
> > (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2419 'package')
> > --- Sun Apr 13 22:26:47 CEST 2014
> >
> > Any ideas what's missing or what i messed up on my system?
>
> These should be owned by ${SHAREOWN}:${SHAREGRP} and check that the modes
> are sane.
>
> I think we could just remove the API and programmer references docs
> though, they aren't useful to most users, and those who do find
> them useful should be capable of looking in the source distribution
> themselves.
>
> > Here's the diff. But be aware that the diff is not yet
> > finished ...
>
> Other things to think about:
>
> - what do users need to do for the upgrade - is it just "log file format
> change" or also "database format change"? we will need to document the
> steps needed, and probably add @ask-update and an faq/current.html section.
>
> - db updates are fairly likely to break other ports; fortunately it's
> a lot less common dependency than last time it was updated in ports,
> so shouldn't be as bad, but definitely needs testing - I can probably
> help with build tests etc for this.
>
> - it will need testing on a wide spread of machine architectures.
>
>
Hi,
Last time i tried to upgrade bdb, it was painfull. All my applications using it
were broken due to
the log format change. A "dump/restore" was needed (i can't remember what i do
to fix the upgrade.. let
me check my old logs ).
IIRC, python < 3 will be broken too because of the py-bsddb module, see
https://docs.python.org/2/library/bsddb.html).
You can find my work on this update here: http://www.raveland.org/bdb/
I don't have retried these diff.. i think a bit of cleaning is needed. But if
you need help, i'm volunteer.
--
Pierre-Emmanuel André <pea at raveland.org>
GPG key: 0xBB8D3F0E
