On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 03:25:37PM +1000, Anders Jensen-Waud wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2014, at 1:35 pm, Anders Jensen-Waud <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have written a new port for Pure -- a functional programming language
> > with term rewriting (http://purelang.bitbucket.org/).
> > 
> > The port is attached as a tarball.
> > 
> > Could I kindly ask you to test and provide feedback?
> > 
> 
> I just realised that there was a make test target available in the base 
> distribution. It has been included in the attached tarball, so please use 
> that one instead. 
> 
> --
> Anders Jensen-Waud

Hi,

Some notes about Makefile:

> SHARED_LIBS +=  pure 8.0

If I remember well, a new port should use 0.0 for version numbering.

> WANTLIB += iconv gmp mpfr pthread readline stdc++ termcap z c m
> 
> LIB_DEPENDS=    devel/gmp devel/mpfr devel/llvm

portcheck(1) complains:
LIB_DEPENDS devel/llvm not needed for lang/pure ?

Sure it is LIB_DEPENDS ? and not a BUILD_ and/or RUN_DEPENDS ?


Else, under i386 the build fail:

===>  Building for pure-0.60
c++ -O2 -pipe  -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include    
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I. 
-I/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60 -DLIBDIR='"/usr/local/lib"' 
-DLIBPURE='"libpure.so.8"' -c -o interpreter.o 
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc: In member function 'void 
interpreter::init()':
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc:285: error: no matching 
function for call to 'llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager::add(llvm::DataLayout*)'
/usr/local/include/llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h:83: note: candidates are: 
virtual void llvm::legacy::FunctionPassManager::add(llvm::Pass*)
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc: In member function 'bool 
interpreter::LoadBitcode(bool, const char*, std::string*)':
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc:2427: error: request for 
member 'empty' in 'M-> llvm::Module::getDataLayout()', which is of non-class 
type 'const llvm::DataLayout*'
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc:2427: error: no match for 
'operator!=' in 'M-> llvm::Module::getDataLayout() != layout'
/usr/local/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:532: note: candidates are: bool 
llvm::operator!=(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)
/usr/local/include/llvm/Target/TargetOptions.h:226: note:                 bool 
llvm::operator!=(const llvm::TargetOptions&, const llvm::TargetOptions&)
/usr/local/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1715: note:                 bool 
llvm::operator!=(uint64_t, const llvm::APInt&)
/usr/local/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:808: note:                 bool 
llvm::operator!=(const llvm::error_code&, const llvm::error_code&)
/usr/local/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:812: note:                 bool 
llvm::operator!=(const llvm::error_code&, const llvm::error_condition&)
/usr/local/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:816: note:                 bool 
llvm::operator!=(const llvm::error_condition&, const llvm::error_code&)
/usr/local/include/llvm/Support/system_error.h:820: note:                 bool 
llvm::operator!=(const llvm::error_condition&, const llvm::error_condition&)
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc:2435: error: invalid operands 
of types 'const char [26]' and 'const llvm::DataLayout*' to binary 'operator+'
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc: In member function 'int 
interpreter::compiler(std::string, std::list<std::basic_string<char, 
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, 
std::allocator<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, 
std::allocator<char> > > >)':
/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/pure-0.60/interpreter.cc:10521: error: 'F_Binary' is 
not a member of 'llvm::sys::fs'
Makefile:249: recipe for target 'interpreter.o' failed
gmake: *** [interpreter.o] Error 1
*** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2695 
'/usr/obj/pobj/pure-0.60/build-i386/.build_done')
*** Error 1 in /usr/ports/mystuff/lang/pure 
(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2423 'all')


-- 
Sébastien Marie

Reply via email to