On 2014/07/24 19:08, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > I don't see any point in having this port when we already have (better > documented) nc(1) in base. And this will get rid of conflict with > net/ucspi-tcp. Nothing depends on net/tcpcat as well.
OK to zap it, though perhaps it makes sense to add the conflict marker to ucspi-tcp anyway for people who had the old one installed?
