2014-07-02 2:20 GMT+04:00 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]>:
> On 2014/07/01 21:23, Jan Stary wrote:
>> > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
>> > documentation for research and educational purpose and without fee is
>> > hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all
>> > copies and that both that the copyright notice and warranty disclaimer
>> > appear in supporting documentation, and that the names of the copyright
>> > holders or any of their entities not be used in advertising or publicity
>> > pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written
>> > prior permission.  Use of this software in whole or in parts for direct
>> > commercial advantage requires explicit prior permission.
>> >
>> >
>> > - This is not a PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=Yes port.
>>
>> What would be a more suitable setting of the PERMIT_* values?
>> Obviously, I am not a lawyer - could someone please break down
>> for me what the license text means for the idividual PERMIT_*'s?
>>
>> (1) COPYRIGHT is installed with the package,
>>   containing the copyright notice and the warranty disclaimer
>>
>> (2) Names of the copyright holders are not used in advertising
>>     without permission
>>
>> (3) Putting this on an OpenBSD CD and selling that CD _would_ be
>>     a "use of this software ... for direct commercial advantage", right?
>>
>>
>> Is (3) the problem?
>> Is it at all possible that this would go in the OpenBSD ports tree?
>> If so, what should the PERMIT_* be?
>
> Permission is only granted "for research and educational purpose and
> without fee". I'm not too sure how it should be set for ftp etc but
> this definitely doesn't allow inclusion on a sold CD.
>
>>
>> Apart from that:
>> any comments on the port itself?
>
> It should be CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu (I noticed because it used gmkdir
> to attempt installing a directory), and NO_TEST=Yes should be removed
> (it is meant for ports which fail if you try to run a test, rather
> than those which don't have a test but don't fail). Apart from that
> and the license marker issue it looks good to me.

Here is updated version, with CONFIGURE_STYLE and NO_TEST tweaked. I
also changed CATEGORIES because RTP is not audio-specific protocol,
and tweaked PERMIT_* lines due to restrictions in COPYRIGHT file.
Still okay to import?

Attachment: net_rtptools_port.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Reply via email to