20 дек. 2014 г. 19:59 пользователь "Christian Weisgerber" <
[email protected]> написал:
>
> On 2014-12-19, Vadim Zhukov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > 2. Now that Qt5 is coming in, and given that some ports already (and
> >    many more will) support both Qt4 and Qt5, it may result in
> >    maintaince burden, to tweak each such port in the way:
> >
> > .if ${FLAVOR:Mqt5}
> > ...
> > .else
> > ...
> > .endif
>
> Why even do this?

At minimum, number of KDE land projects, such as Akonadi and Phonon, will
have to have both versions. I hope to drop KDE4 around 5.9 time in favor of
KF5+ Applications, but what to do before that?

Same story would happen with QCA, for example.

> > The only real change is that MODQT*_WANTLIB becomes a trick itself:
> > you can set up both MODQT4_WANLTIB and MODQT5_WANTLIB in a port,
>
> BTW, there is no MODQT5_WANTLIB at the moment.

Yes, but it's added in the original patch.

> > An alternative approach could be switching all Qt4 users to Qt5,
> > or, at least, making sure that Qt4 won't mix in otherwise Qt5-ready
> > software.

I plan to take a closer look to our Qt4 ports in January, if they ever
could be ported to Qt5 as of now. Hope there would not be that much of dead
ones...

--
Vadim Zhukov

Reply via email to