>well, jdk 1.7 just stopped building. because one file is >10 years old and >there is an explicit check for that in the build process. > >Just think about it. > >I know 1st year students who are smarter than that. > >This is one of the stupidest bugs I've seen, on a part with 19100...
Conterpoint: Or it is smart. Old unmaintained code is often dangerous code. If noone loves it, there is usually a reason.
