Hey, On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Frankly, I see no point in having it: > > 1. It is developped on Archlinux and for Archlinux. Developpers seem > to have little interest in portability, and are somewhat hostile > towards patches for fixing things on BSDs. > 2. Upstream is slow. It was slow when the project was actively > developped, and now it is yet slower. Diffs and pull requests are > reviewed mostly be people with no commit access. > 3. Basically vimb is better in dwb's own game.
Gotta agree with you here, except on the third argument (unfortunately vimb has no tabs ;), but that doesn't justify keeping a broken port. I'd go for deleting it, unless someone else wants to maintain it who has the time and resources to fix the current state. Henrik
