It looks like the current versions of those two Aspell dictionaries
do have license information now. For Esperanto it's GPLv2, and
Russian is ultra-slim permissive one (somewhat strange for me).
Okay to flip the switch and finally get aspell-es and aspell-ru
packages?
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
Index: eo/Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/aspell/dicts/eo/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 Makefile
--- eo/Makefile 11 Mar 2013 11:42:40 -0000 1.6
+++ eo/Makefile 31 Jul 2015 02:02:40 -0000
@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ COMMENT= aspell dictionary for Esperanto
CATEGORIES= textproc
DISTNAME= aspell6-eo-2.1.20000225a-2
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU:=aspell/dict/eo/}
+REVISION= 0
-# dubious: wordlist has no copyright nor license
-PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= No
-PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= No
-PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= No
+# GPLv2
+PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes
.include <bsd.port.mk>
Index: ru/Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/aspell/dicts/ru/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 Makefile
--- ru/Makefile 11 Mar 2013 11:42:40 -0000 1.6
+++ ru/Makefile 31 Jul 2015 02:02:40 -0000
@@ -4,10 +4,9 @@ COMMENT= aspell dictionary for Russian
CATEGORIES= textproc
DISTNAME= aspell6-ru-0.99f7-1
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU:=aspell/dict/ru/}
+REVISION= 0
-# dubious: wordlist has no copyright nor license
-PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= No
-PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= No
-PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= No
+# see Copyright file
+PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Yes
.include <bsd.port.mk>
