Michael Lesniewski writes: > On 08/03/15 12:56, Aaron Bieber wrote: >> >> Michael Lesniewski writes: >> >>> On 07/20/15 13:06, Michael Lesniewski wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/27/15 23:38, Michael Lesniewski wrote: >>>>> Hi ports, >>>>> Attached is an update to the latest version of synergy. >>>>> Dependency on cryptopp is dropped as upstream no longer uses it. >>>>> Upstream also has changed the filename format of tarballs, comments on >>>>> how this has been implemented in the diff are welcome. >>>>> Tested on amd64 to Win 7. >>>>> Have tested to try and ensure diff applies correctly, fingers crossed >>>>> I did it ok this time. >>>>> Any other comments/suggestions welcome. >>>> Ping 2? >>>> >>> Ping, would be nice to have updated before ports lock, or at the very >>> least, some comments? >> >> Tests fine for me here. >> >> portcheck complains about missing RCS tags: >> >> patches/patch-src_lib_arch_CMakeLists_txt does not have $OpenBSD$ RCS tag at >> the top >> patches/patch-src_lib_io_CryptoMode_cryptopp_h does not have $OpenBSD$ RCS >> tag at the top >> patches/patch-src_lib_io_CryptoStream_cryptopp_h does not have $OpenBSD$ RCS >> tag at the top >> patches/patch-src_lib_server_ClientProxy1_4_cpp does not have $OpenBSD$ RCS >> tag at the top >> patches/patch-src_test_CMakeLists_txt does not have $OpenBSD$ RCS tag at the >> top >> net/synergy >> > These were new files added and according to the patch section of > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/testing.html#Testing, RCS tags > shouldn't be included as they are automatically added on import. > Or am I misunderstanding that section?
At least $OpenBSD$ should be added, this is a feature in "make update-patches". My workflow is this: cd $(make show=WRKSRC) cp file.a file.a.orig - modify file.a - cd - make update-patches cat patches/patch-file_a The file generated will (correctly) have the $OpenBSD$ bit at the top. The rest of the info in that header is added by CVS when it is committed.
