On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 02:51:53PM +0200, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:34:17 +0100, Stuart Henderson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2015/09/12 10:00, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > > A few days after this email, I made a new claws-mail package on my > > > laptop without the patches that were containing the link of the bug > > > id 2640 or 2642 (hard way ...). I don't really understand what the > > > patches should do but I haven't encountered any problem. > > > > So how about this with those extra patches (i.e. the ones that > > upstream rejected) removed? > > I guess it's fine. Thanks!
Just for the record, all those patches were added 3 years ago, see http://marc.info/?t=134083762400001&r=1&w=2 for history. Landry
