On 09/18/15 11:09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2015/09/18 10:57, Fred wrote:
Hi ports@
In our link-grammar port we only have bindings for java - I would like to
add the python bindings should I add more flavors?
And while here is should I add the other bindings (ie lisp, ocaml, perl?)
Or is there a better approach?
Cheers
Fred
my 2p:
Since perl is in base there doesn't seem much point in providing an
option to disable that during build.
For python, since the scaffolding is already done, it makes sense to
continue with a no_* pseudo-flavour and BUILD_PACKAGES handling.
I'd defer adding other bindings until there's an actual need for them.
It just means more things to check when updating the other languages
and if nobody's actually using them that's wasted effort.
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for the hint - I'll just stick with adding the python bindings as
the link-grammar developers recommend:
http://search.cpan.org/~dbrian/Lingua-LinkParser/
for perl.
Cheers
Fred
