On 2016/02/04 12:53, Theo Buehler wrote: > > If you can just add comments to patches explaining why you do the > > getenv(HOME) dance to avoid getpw in pledge for the next guy that > > stumbles upon it.. > > Since that's my hack, I added a short explanation to the patch itself. > I also added a comment to the Makefile to explain the -DNOUSERS option. > > ok?
I think we need to take it easy on adding new pledges now until we're done with 5.9, we aren't going to get wide enough testing in to identify use cases that we've missed before it's too late to fix them..
