On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:46:51PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/alpha/ > shows pretty clearly that GCC 4.6 is not equivalent to 4.9. Ports > that use MODULES=gcc4 and that build fine elsewhere with 4.9 are > broken on alpha with 4.6 because the compiler is too old. > > If somebody wants to go through the list of MODULES=gcc4 ports and > individually mark those that build with 4.6, that's great, but as > a default it doesn't make sense.
+1 from me. That somebody could also try finishing the missing bits for 4.9 on alpha.. http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/alpha/2016-01-08/lang/gcc/4.9%2C-c%2B%2B.log Landry
