On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:13:31 +0100 Frederic Cambus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks for testing once again :-) Indeed, there was a remaining > > build warning, added a new patch to address this, it has been fixed > > by upstream already. > > > > While I was at it, I pledged the port. I'm glad I did, because > > testing for all use cases made me realize I forgot to add a run > > dependency. > > > > Also fixed the man page name dilemna by renaming the target man > > page to multimail.1, which matches the package name and point to > > the right binary name. > > Updated tarball attached which adds a missing '# uses pledge()' > marker. OK from me. Anyone cares to give a second one so I can get this in the tree? Regards, Adam
