On 2016/04/25 17:08, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/04/25 15:11, [email protected] wrote: > > Apr 25 15:01:01 host /bsd: chrome(2929): sysctl 2: 6 19 433940382 > > -788461926 430637056 -255 > > Apr 25 15:01:01 host /bsd: chrome(2929): syscall 202 "" > > Thanks, this gave an easier way to track it down, I've hit this > but hadn't been able to correlate it with anything failing before. > This might do the trick.
Diff retracted, there are different pledges for kUtilityProcess, so don't bother building this to test - Robert is building a different one.
