First of all, it's great to see this effort. But, we have seen diffs in ports tree which were irrelevant, eg. upstream solved the issues the diffs were trying to solve specifically for OpenBSD ports tree.
semarie@ did a review for TBB and he raised some question about diverting from upstream. As TBB is anonymity oriented sw and can be considered by users as "safe to use", this raises a question - what is the trust between all changes in OpenBSD ports tree and upstream? What would be regular review mode? I have no answer to this question but I would be hesitant to see current situation as optimal, because a little mistake/oversight could have real impact on TBB users using it in some peculiar countries. I just wanted to show my cautiousness towards potential issues just existing in OpenBSD porting effort itself. j.
