Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> writes:

>> I don't think that getpwnam_shadow is a big concern.  Fixes can be
>> applied to -stable with relatively minor churn, if needed.
>
> They are being discovered slower than I expected.  Maybe there are only
> a handful left.
>
>  > I don't think that 6.0 can ship with wxneeded enforced.  There's just
>> too much to do, and afaik no one is trying to fix the few big ports that
>> would need it.
>
> I don't think we are tightening the enforcement.  As a result, 6.0
> is probably going out the door with "noisy reporting", and we'll collect
> information from the community.  Is that a good strategy?  Or should
> we silence it.

The logs could make a serial connection temporarily unusable.  That
said, I think that noisy by default would be fine, if it could be
disabled.

-- 
jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to