[email protected] (Jeremie Courreges-Anglas) wrote: > "J.A. Neitzel" <[email protected]> writes:
[snip] > You can't expect people to answer that fast. Thanks, I understand that now. > > In any case, I have attached my patch to this message. > > The ports tree is locked. It is too late for anything that is not > a security/significant bugfix. Could you please submit your diff again > after ports unlock? I could do so, but whatever william@ prefers to do? I sent him my patch, and he said he will update it after ports unlock. > BTW, a quick explanation for this > > - WANT_PRIVSEP=0 > + WANT_DOTLOCK=1 > > could be useful. WANT_PRIVSEP was dropped in favour of WANT_DOTLOCK for v14.8.4 and later. From s-nail-14.8.9/NEWS: . WANT_PRIVSEP and PRIVSEP_GROUP have been dropped. . New option: WANT_DOTLOCK, by default enabled. ... In effect, using `WANT_PRIVSEP=0' with s-nail-14.8.9 results in installing /usr/local/libexec/s-nail-privsep anyway. > > Regards & Cheers, > > Jeff > > -- > jca | PGP: 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE Thanks again. Jeff -- Jeffrey Allen Neitzel Osh Project (V6Shell) - http://v6shell.org/
