As edd noticed, when you're updating a port, patches sometimes misapply
in a bad way, and it can be hard to spot them with the default quiet
patch flags. Any objection to flipping the default for PATCH_DEBUG to
make this easier to see? OK?
Index: bsd.port.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.1320
diff -u -p -r1.1320 bsd.port.mk
--- bsd.port.mk 18 Aug 2016 12:28:53 -0000 1.1320
+++ bsd.port.mk 3 Sep 2016 11:55:32 -0000
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ PATCHORIG ?= .orig
PATCH_STRIP ?= -p0
PATCH_DIST_STRIP ?= -p0
-PATCH_DEBUG ?= No
+PATCH_DEBUG ?= Yes
.if ${PATCH_DEBUG:L} != "no"
PATCH_ARGS ?= -d ${WRKDIST} -z ${PATCHORIG} -E ${PATCH_STRIP}
PATCH_DIST_ARGS ?= -z ${DISTORIG} -d ${WRKDIST} -E ${PATCH_DIST_STRIP}
