Could someone test this on mips64 and mips64el please, to make sure that
the added code doesn't cause any problems?
---
Changes since the last public release (1.6.24):
Reject oversized iCCP profile immediately.
Cleaned up PNG_DEBUG compile of pngtest.c.
Conditionally compile png_inflate().
Don't install pngcp; it conflicts with pngcp in the pngtools package.
Minor editing of INSTALL, (whitespace, added copyright line)
Added MIPS support (Mandar Sahastrabuddhe <mandar.sahastrabud...@imgtec.com>).
Rebased contrib/intel/intel_sse.patch after the MIPS implementation.
---
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/png/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.113
diff -u -p -r1.113 Makefile
--- Makefile 20 Aug 2016 20:52:53 -0000 1.113
+++ Makefile 3 Sep 2016 12:28:41 -0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COMMENT= library for manipulating PNG images
-VERSION= 1.6.24
+VERSION= 1.6.25
DISTNAME= libpng-${VERSION}
PKGNAME= png-${VERSION}
CATEGORIES= graphics
Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/png/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -p -r1.50 distinfo
--- distinfo 20 Aug 2016 20:52:53 -0000 1.50
+++ distinfo 3 Sep 2016 12:28:41 -0000
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (libpng-1.6.24.tar.xz) = eTLcnl5F1V7OnSBOkBlru18sgnQcyw9+ENB9Nkpv1t0=
-SIZE (libpng-1.6.24.tar.xz) = 977532
+SHA256 (libpng-1.6.25.tar.xz) = Cf6Ng0Hov8+zJjEA2ax+ohVbKN2FNfF5ERwWcqyNiBE=
+SIZE (libpng-1.6.25.tar.xz) = 982204
Index: pkg/PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/png/pkg/PLIST,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p -r1.31 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST 20 Aug 2016 20:52:53 -0000 1.31
+++ pkg/PLIST 3 Sep 2016 12:28:41 -0000
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
bin/libpng-config
bin/libpng16-config
@bin bin/png-fix-itxt
-@bin bin/pngcp
@comment @bin bin/pngfix
include/libpng16/
include/libpng16/png.h
