Sat, 3 Sep 2016 10:14:19 +0100 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> > On 2016/09/03 02:38, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > Upstream is dead and the maintainer has not updated the port for years. > > OK?. > > Either it should be updated or removed. There are a couple of commits > recently so it doesn't seem *totally* dead upstream, but it's not very > active.
Hi ports@, There is one possible use case as transition away from rewrite rules, the approach cherokee uses allows beginners a hands on with rewrites. Kind regards, Anton > If nobody is using it -> remove > > If somebody is using it and willing to maintain -> keep > > > Subpackages require something special in quirks? > > You just need to list all the subpackages. >
