On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Pascal Stumpf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:08:37 +0800, Dongsheng Song wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Pascal Stumpf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Here's a preliminary port of GCC 6.2.0, tested only on amd64, i386 and > > > sparc64 as I don't have access to anything else at the moment. > > > > > > Go ahead and play with it. > > > > > > > Thanks for your great work ! > > > > But when I install gcc 6.2, it conflicted with gcc 4.9.4, I must remove > gcc > > 4.9.4 ( then llvm 3.8.1) at first. > > > > Could you support them coexist by the version specific technology? > > > > That's quite a bit of work for questionable benefit, as we usually > switch our whole ports tree to one specific version at once and then get > rid of the old one. But I will not object to a working patch if you > have one. > Your patch block llvm 3.8.1, I'm not care about gcc 4.9.4, but llvm 3.8.1 depends gcc 4.
