"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" <czark...@gmail.com> writes:

> Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
>
>>I don't use mpv, but the fact that it uses libsmbclient puts mpv on my
>>plate when I update samba.  Last time I checked I didn't find the
>>smbclient support particularly useful (access files on network
>>filesystems that aren't mounted locally).  I'd be thankful if you just
>>killed any samba support in mpv.
>
> Well, if nobody will be missing samba support in mov, there is no really
> a good reason for "lite" flavor any more:  most of other features I
> disabled in "lite" flavor don't pull a lot of dependencies, and most of
> them may be disabled in config file.  Then a routine update.
>
> OK?

Looks fine ports-wise, ok jca@

I took a closer look and I must say that I'm quite pleased to see mpv
perform better than mplayer on a few large movies I have (automatic
re-sync of video and audio, duh...).  And now that mpv doesn't link with
libsmbclient any more, I have no reason to go back to mplayer.

I see "pthread_mutex_destroy on mutex with waiters!" messages when
switching audio tracks, but I guess they are not new.

Thanks,
-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to