On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > * Various fixes from a forked Github version (there was no official > > elvis release since 2004), clang warns about most of them. > > Not an elvis user or familiar with development, but would it make > any sense to switch to the fork rather than just take some patches?
Yes, I agree. However, we'd probably be the first to use this fork, so I want to make sure that the first patches are OK, and I'll probably switch to the forked version in a second step. On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/04/17 15:55, Donovan Watteau wrote: > > * Fix a build failure with clang; some <termcap.h> symbols were > > redefined (patch-guitcap_c). > > This class of failures is being looked at (and doesn't affect arm64 > which is the only arch where this will actually be built with clang > in bulks for now) so I think it makes sense to skip this one for now. > > Others committed. OK, thank you!
