Le 2017-05-03 10:51, Paul Fariello a écrit :
On 2016-04-06 12:35:58, Solène Rapenne wrote:
Le 2016-03-29 17:23, Solène Rapenne a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> My system : (current, amd64)
> OpenBSD 5.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1970: Mon Mar 28 17:02:06 MDT 2016
>
> [email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
>
> I installed lang/erlang17 (erlang-17.5p5v0) and the command are
> suffixed by 17 (erl17 for erl, erlc17 for erlc). Problem, erlc17 tries
> to call "erl" binary, which doesn't exist.
>
> ~~~ Terminal ~~~
> # erlc17
> erlc: Error 2 executing 'erl'.
> ~~~~~~~~
>
Hello,
With this patch, lang/erlang/17 gives erlc17 which works. No
regression
found.
I think the same work should be done for 16 and 18 too. While the
pre-configure is common for the 3 versions, the substitution isn't
done
for every file for the 3 versions but they still compile fine and
there
is no error issued.
Hi all,
I'm exhuming this quite old mail from Solène.
I'm having the exact same issue on both erlang17 and erlang18.
OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC.MP) #1616: Fri Feb 26 01:28:13 MST 2016
[email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
I'm not currently running 6.1 (shame on me !) but erlang{17,18} ports
doesn't
seems to have changes concerning this issue.
Is there any plan of merging Solène's patches ?
If not, how can we help fixing the issue ?
Regards,
Hello
A workaround is to create a symbolic link erl in $PATH to the installed
erl.
