Hi,
apart from the responses from edd@ and sthen@: did anyone give this
diff a try? And tested wether everything still works as expected?
Especially xetex / xelatex (who are linked against both libstdc++
and libestdc++)?
Ciao,
Kili
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:10:29PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:10:29 +0200
> From: Matthias Kilian <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Use C++-11 for print/texlive/base
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> the pending update of print/poppler will require the use of a C++-11
> capable compiler, so set COMPILER=gcc.
>
> Builds fine for me on amd64 (still with gcc as the default compiler
> in base). Something in this port seems to need ${LIBCXX}, and setting
> COMPILER=gcc appends ${LIBECXX}, so we now have both in WANTLIB. I
> hope that's ok (texlive_base mostly contains binaries and only a
> few libraries, so let's hope that nothing uses both ${LIBCXX} and
> ${LIBECXX}).
>
> ok?
>
> Ciao,
> Kili
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/texlive/base/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.88
> diff -u -p -r1.88 Makefile
> --- Makefile 21 May 2017 11:57:45 -0000 1.88
> +++ Makefile 26 Jun 2017 18:56:15 -0000
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ DISTNAME = texlive-${DIST_V}b-source
> PKGNAME = texlive_base-${V}
> WRKDIST = ${WRKDIR}/texlive-${DIST_V}-source
>
> +REVISION = 0
> +
> DISTFILES = ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} \
> texlive-${DIST_V}-extra${EXTRACT_SUFX}
>
> @@ -43,6 +45,9 @@ LIB_DEPENDS = converters/libiconv \
> graphics/potrace
>
> MODULES = textproc/intltool perl
> +
> +# c++-11 required for poppler
> +COMPILER = gcc
>
> # Never set SEPARATE_BUILD
> CONFIGURE_STYLE = gnu
