Hi, The license marker in ru-ptsans says OFL, but I can't find any mention of OFL either on the website or in the distfile. The "ParaType Free Font Licensing Agreement" seems free enough though.
We could probably swing PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM given the commercial bundling allowance but might as well avoid any risk. While here, switch homepage/master_sites to https. ok? Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/ports/fonts/ru-ptsans/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile --- Makefile 13 Aug 2015 20:02:43 -0000 1.7 +++ Makefile 16 Nov 2017 03:39:50 -0000 @@ -4,19 +4,19 @@ COMMENT = free Cyrillic fonts PKG_ARCH = * DISTNAME = ru-ptsans-3.0 CATEGORIES = fonts x11 +REVISION = 0 MAINTAINER = Vadim Zhukov <[email protected]> # Original distfile taken from http://www.fontstock.com/public/ -MASTER_SITES = http://ohvost.ru/distfiles/ -HOMEPAGE = http://paratype.com/public/ +MASTER_SITES = https://ohvost.ru/distfiles/ +HOMEPAGE = https://www.paratype.com/public/ -# OFL, http://scripts.sil.org/OFL (CC-like) -# permits: -# Distribution, Reproduction, Embedding, DerivativeWorks -# requires -# Attribution, Notice, ShareAlike, DerivativeRenaming, -# BundlingWhenSelling -PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = Yes +# ParaType Free Font Licensing Agreement 1.2 / 1.3 +# "ParaType Ltd grants you the right to use, copy, modify, and +# distribute modified and unmodified copies" ... +# "but you may not sell the fonts by themselves." +PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM = Non-commercial +PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP = Yes NO_BUILD = Yes NO_TEST = Yes
