Frederic Cambus writes: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 11:47:19AM +0100, Frederic Cambus wrote: > > We have sdlmame and sdlmess in ports, but I decided to go with a new > > port for several reasons: > > > > - The sdlmame and sdlmess projects do not exist anymore (since several > > years now), there is now a single code base building on several > > operating systems > > - The latest sdlmame and sdlmess versions we have in ports are in fact > > MAME > > - MAME and MESS merged in 2015, and although it's still possible to > > build a separate executable for MESS, I'm not sure if it makes sense > > from a package size and build time perspective > > > > So the idea is to import this new port with conflict markers, and to > > remove sdlmame and sdlmess when we are confident this new version > > works well enough.
The port looks and plays fine, and I agree with keeping it to a single package. ok bentley@
