On Thu, Apr 26 2018, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:29:43PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2018/04/25 11:39, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > On 2018/04/25 11:35, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > > This mail includes an inline diff and new ports in an attached tgz to >> > > do the following: >> > >> > oops, replacement tgz attached. one missing @conflict and some reordering >> > for consistency. >> >> quick ping, since I've already had to merge conflicts about 3 times in quirks >> already I'd quite like to get the 50 M's out of my tree, any OKs to get the >> new >> ports in? > > Neat trick with the ${MODPECL_56ONLY}@pkgpath archivers/pecl-mailparse > lines. > > Beware of the PLIST.orig/.int files in the import -
> also, since > pecl_http is renamed, it's a different pkgname, so do you really need to > bump REVISION ? Nitpicker ;) Upgrades seem to work fine here (tested with memcache and memcached). If there are remaining glitches they can be fixed later IMO, ok jca@ -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
