On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:41:01PM +0300, mazocomp wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 08:17:56PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > 
> > On 04/28/18 19:43, mazocomp wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > Is there any hope this port will be accepted
> > > or should I keep maintaining it in WIP tree?
> > > 
> > > I know toxcore is unstable, but I don't know alternatives.
> > > (except bloated ricochet and retroshare)
> > > 
> > 
> > toxcore's license marker should be tweaked to GPLv3+, otherwise ok.
> > toxic doesn't need HOMEPAGE set if you're using GH_*, otherwise ok.
> > utox sets -std=gnu11 so should have COMPILER=base-clang ports-gcc, also
> > needs NO_TEST=Yes, otherwise ok.
> > 
> Ok, done.
> 
> > I don't know anyone who uses tox so I can't test beyond making sure they
> > start up and close without crashing, with both do.
> > 
> > You are not listed as MAINTAINER of any of these. Do you want to be
> > MAINTAINER?
> > 
> Oh, can I? Ok, I'll try.

I think you need to set USE_LIBTOOL = Yes (or gnu, depending on how it
uses it) in toxcore so that proper setup of libtool is done. Besides
that those ports look okay to me.

Landry

Reply via email to