On 2018/05/09 14:55, Martijn van Duren wrote: > On 05/08/18 18:49, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Better to just fix phar on sparc64...does anyone have more information > > on the problem? > > > I agree, but right now sparc64 has nothing. We can always remove the > subpackage broken for arch scaffolding after sparc64 is fixed.
It has 5.6. And this change to move all the multipackages before including bsd.port.arch.mk is pretty nasty. > Also, there's other aspects of to this patch that haven't been > addressed, namely installing phar(1) and moving the phar extension > into a separate package. yes, more splitting up of extensions that don't need to be split up...
