On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:35:56PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Looks good diff-wise, although it fails to start (presumably because > dbus is not running); I couldn't find information in the port telling > me that it needs to be running.
The ecosystem is not really ready for not having dbus, as before the failure was silently hidden behind autolaunching. Generally, i'd advise anyone not running dbus on purpose for whatever reason to set DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS to a bogus value, and hope that applications gracefully handle a broken bus. Or run a session dbus.
