On 2018-07-02 18.02.08 -0500, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote: > Is there another way ports are tracked besides the mailing list so > anyone can find a status without searching the archives?
Not really, no. Mailing list archive + CVS repo are the best we have right now. It's not that no one wants this to change, but the change itself requires a lot of work. Really long, slightly ongoing, thread on how we could improve this, from misc@: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=149789110906191&w=2 (That thread starts as being about bugs@ but ports is mentioned somewhere in there, and the same concepts and concerns apply.) > I know I have some submissions which I fixed up upon request but no > idea if they were merged, and they are pending in the jasperla GitHub. > Additionally, there may be half done ports already out there that were > not merged, pending changes, no sense in people starting over on these The jasperla GitHub repo is convenient and nice for communicating whether someone is working on a difficult port, but it is not a source of truth. Note that I am just an observer (and port maintainer). -Mike
