Hi Charlène --
On 08/28/18 11:19, Charlene Wendling wrote:
Hi!
Peter Selinger mailed me about the test failure, and decided that the
support for '-' as a getopt shortoption will be dropped for the 1.12
release. He sent me a patch that i've tested and everything is fine.
I have 2 solutions to deal with this:
1. Update the Makefile with proper commenting.
2. Include the one-liner patch, and drop the included getopt configure
option.
I took the decision to go for 1. and am sending an updated diff. Tell me
if you want to go with 2., i'll comply.
Charlène.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 04:14:57 +0200
Charlene Wendling wrote:
Hi ports,
Here is an update for ccrypt, a tool that encrypts and decrypts AES
files and streams.
What's new upstream (only the most interesting bits for the port, full
changelog there [1]):
- Many compilation warnings/errors fixes, --with-included-getopt added
to configure options
- Add stdin "-" argument support, for cat (-c) and unixmode (-u)
options.
- New Estonian translation
What's new in the port:
- Updated DESCR: we don't ship the emacs flavor anymore since revision
1.15 [2] of the Makefile.
- PLIST wasn't up to date, so this update introduces French and German
translations from ccrypt v1.8, in addition to the Estonian one.
- Added --with-included-getopt to CONFIGURE_ARGS because tests
fail if we use our own getopt, due to a different handling of '-' as
an argument. Thanks to ccrypt's author Peter Selinger for pointers on
this issue.
Testing (proot/amd64 + i386):
- No other port depends on this one
- 'make test' is OK. It skips the crypt(3) test because we're not
using the included replacement libcrypt.
- Tested the "-" argument support for -c and -u options, to check if
the getopt issue above was really solved, it is.
- No regressions found in my daily use of ccencrypt, ccdecrypt and
ccat.
Comments/feedbacks are welcome!
Charlène.
[1] http://ccrypt.sourceforge.net/ChangeLog
[2]
https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/security/ccrypt/Makefile.diff?r2=1.22&r1=1.15&f=u
PS: By the way, thanks for your comments on the discount update :)
I think your approach is fine.
Not a condition for committing the update but your mail makes it seem
like you're a regular user of this so I would invite you to consider
becoming MAINTAINER for it.
~Brian
