On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 05:19:40PM -0700, William Orr wrote: > This diff adds erlang major versions 20 and 21. Tested by building > elixir and running the test suite. How did you do so when the respective devel/rebar flavours are missing?
kn:/usr/ports/lang/elixir:4362$ make MODERL_VERSION=21 test ===> Checking files for elixir-1.7.3 `/var/distfiles/elixir-1.7.3.tar.gz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) elixir-1.7.3.tar.gz: OK Invalid FLAVOR set: erlang21 (in devel/rebar) Fatal: Unknown flavor: erlang21 (in devel/rebar) (Possible flavors are: erlang16 erlang17 erlang18 erlang19 ). (in devel/rebar) *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/devel/rebar (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:3528 '.BEGIN': @exit 1) Problem with dependency devel/rebar,erlang21 *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2107 '/tmp/pobj/elixir-1.7.3/.dep-devel-rebar,erlang21') *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2498 '/tmp/pobj/elixir-1.7.3/.extract_done') *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/lang/elixir (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2419 'test') That said, we need to port https://github.com/erlang/rebar3 as our rebar-2.6.2 is deprecated. > Given that erlang 16 is no longer supported, it may be a good idea > to remove that, however I haven't included that change in my diff. I agree, but that's a job for after the 6.4 release. Since 16 is the default version in our tree, which should be next? Either ways, this should go through a bulk build. > The 20 and 21 dirs are included in the tarball. Both build fine on sparc64.
