Marc Espie: > > I'm more inclined to remove USE_LLD again. > > What actual use do you envision for either USE_LLD=Yes on !clang > > or USE_LLD=No on clang archs? > > the vmm bios ? doesn't it require some kind of weird 16 bit support.
That's a singular case that can be handled by passing in LD=ld.bfd if we can't find a solution with lld. Once we get over the Mesa blocker, I need to talk sthen@ into doing an i386 bulk build with lld. I expect some additional fallout compared to amd64 due to crufty non-PIC asm code, but should anything turn up that can't be made to work with lld, it will likely be a candidate for deletion. I don't exactly forsee a use for USE_LLD on non-x86 either. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [email protected]
