> This version is much nicer. I agree your version is more pleasing. I approve of using this.
I'm still new around here and learning the conventions, so having this to diff is very helpful for me. My interpretation of Mike's (the upstream) response was that pcalc-4 isn't known to work reliably on 32 bit systems right now, but I would appreciate it if anyone with an i386 or other 32 bit arch could test to make sure the issue (https://github.com/vapier/pcalc/issues/7) isn't macppc specific. I'm happy to continue being the liaison to the upstream as other arches or issues are discovered. I think it should be safe to ship pcalc-4 as it stands on AMD64, and probably other 64 bit arches (I don't have any to test on though). Thanks for your help Brian!
