On Mon, Dec 17 2018, Edward Lopez-Acosta <[email protected]> wrote: > Should py-aiohttp be updated first to allow this to match upstream as users > may expect? > > I know there are many dependants on that though so might be a bit of work. > Will save extra work on black in the future too, along with anything else > that may need py-aiohttp updated.
I'm puzzled by the need for a web server in a source code formatter package. 8) Daniel's proposal looks reasonable to me. I would add a comment in the patch, though. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
